.

You are on BIGFOOT BALLYHOO

Attention European Union Law Users: There are cookies on this blog: Blogger and Goggle maybe more. I hope this meets the need to inform users of this site.


This site is a BIGFOOT ONLINE MAGAZINE, where you can 'Talk Bigfoot.' YOU DO NOT HAVE TO GIVE YOUR NAME.


HOW TO COMMENT
Below post is line that reads:
POSTED BY LINDA NEWTON-PERRY AT OO:OO (TIME) AND THEN WILL READ NO COMMENTS (OR HOW MANY COMMENTS, 1 COMMENT ETC.) CLICK ON THE COMMENTS AND FOLLOW DIRECTIONS.

.

TRY ANOTHER BROWSER IF THE PICTURES AND TEXT ARE JUMBLED UP.


Sunday, January 22, 2012

Guest: Editor-Blogger


Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "What's Your Opinion?":



Some might say that not telling the public that Bigfoot is real constitutes putting the public in danger. I would disagree with that for the following reasons. We don't know what Bigfoot actually is. We don't have a number in population.We know nothing about the temperament of the animal. And last but not least,we don't want people to think everywhere they go one or more of them might be present.

Being a long time hunter in the state of Oregon, I've only seen one Bigfoot and it never approached me.With regards to the forest service telling people this animal is out there--it simply will not happen.

 Employees of the government have no right to divulge what they know about Bigfoot. We have enough problems with people on federal land now without telling them that Bigfoot is real.

Protocol is clear inside the government concerning Bigfoot. If one of us in the forest service sight one then we report it to our superior and let them decide on any actions.


____________

I thank you very much for your comment. But, still, I think we should know the animal exists if the government knows it exists! ... LNP




No comments: