.

You are on BIGFOOT BALLYHOO

Attention European Union Law Users: There are cookies on this blog: Blogger and Goggle maybe more. I hope this meets the need to inform users of this site.


This site is a BIGFOOT ONLINE MAGAZINE, where you can 'Talk Bigfoot.' YOU DO NOT HAVE TO GIVE YOUR NAME.


HOW TO COMMENT
Below post is line that reads:
POSTED BY LINDA NEWTON-PERRY AT OO:OO (TIME) AND THEN WILL READ NO COMMENTS (OR HOW MANY COMMENTS, 1 COMMENT ETC.) CLICK ON THE COMMENTS AND FOLLOW DIRECTIONS.

.

TRY ANOTHER BROWSER IF THE PICTURES AND TEXT ARE JUMBLED UP.


Sunday, February 14, 2010

David Paulides Replys to Mr. Nells Objections to NABS


Guest


Guest Editor-Blogger: David Paulides

Mr. Nells,

We have NEVER approached anyone in the area that you've indicated and asked them to sign an affidavit and they didn't. I know because I have been on each project we've done in that region.

I'd like to know how you have access to our researchers and their locations since your information is inaccurate.

An affidavit is nothing more then a person swearing under the penalty of perjury that they are telling the truth. It is a check and balance system for us to ensure that we have the correct statement from the witness. They are inclined to read the statement thoroughly before signing thus the accuracy of the statement is ensured, nothing more.

I have NO IDEA where you get the idea we are jealous of Oregon researchers, WE ARE some of the Oregon researchers you describe. WE ARE presenting to Oregon people at the symposium. We have nothing to be jealous about, we are an inclusive group, not exclusive. We will gladly share research, contrary to most groups. We DO NOT alter witness statements like some groups, what the witness states is what we keep.We do not exclude statements that don't fit with our theories, we include everyone's statement, it's important to our credibility.

The bigfoot community is an unusual group. We have found that there are a handful of people that completely fabricate stories about our group for some unknown reason. When they cite examples, they never cite specific incidence, it's always generalities with no names...

Why you would state that we are not in the field makes no sense. You obviously haven't read either of our books. The Hoopa Project was a two year field study. Tribal Bigfoot was another 2 years throughout the western U.S.

It's amazing to me that people want to cause hatred and animosity amongst our community. We do not make negative public statements about anyone and we aren't about to lower our standards by doing it now. Please read our mission statement and objectives and you'll see that we are sincere, honest and thorough. I would encourage anyone to read the Hoopa Newspaper archives and see what the native Americans say about us being in their community, it's all postive!

David Paulides

Executive Director

North America Bigfoot Search





14 comments:

Montana said...

Your information on this blog is inaccurate. You said WE ARE the Oregon searchers. How goofy can a person get!. Bigfoot is not a excluvive animal. Anybody has the right to look for the beast not just a chosen few. Don't call yourself the expert here. Presenting at the OBS is something you choose to do, not because you have anything new to offer.

Ted said...

I very interested in Mr Paulides website. He seems to praise Ray Wallace for years of lying about bigfoot. May I ask a question? If NABS is so well liked in Northern California why does BLM refuse them entry into some of the Bluff Creek areas.

Tom D said...

don't even know this NABS but wasn't they the same ones that came close accusing the people at Squaw Lake of trying to kill one? This Paulides person seems to think all people lie about bigfoot sightings.

Anonymous said...

Mr Montana needs a lesson in reading comprehension: Paulides didn't say that they are the Oregon researchers as if there are no others, only that they are SOME of the Oregon researchers..I don't see him calling himself the expert here & for all you know, Montana, he may well have something new to present at the OBS next summer...
Mr Paulides: the more successful and known a BF researcher becomes the more likely he is to become a target of a disinformation campaign..Expect more attacks on your character and to have actions and statements falsely attributed to you and your organization..The goal is to sow dissention and distrust in the BF research community so that that community expends much energy answering false charges and appears to outsiders as groups of squabbling deluded idiots...Unfortunately, this campaign has been all too successful over the years.....

BFRO Member said...

I didn't know that writing a couple of fiction books qualifies him as successful. He has in the recent past been the disinformation not others. His group doesn't have any new evidence on bigfoot just conjecture. Some of the statements in the past tell me he has no idea what bigfoot is or isn't.It is irresponsible to try to give false statements like "There going in to bring out a body" many other off the wall stuff too. and by the way I know him personally so don't say I'm beating up on him.

Hoopa Bill said...

This Is typical NABS, attack, attack the other guy! They routinely put out stories about how they research bigfoot. Only problem is in fact Law Enforcement will not work with them, In fact BLM will notwork with them.In fact David goes off the wall sometimes. There really is not a team to speak off, as suggested belonging to NABS. Please folks: check your sources for information on this outfit.

Anonymous said...

Ladies and gentlemen
The people on the fringe of the bigfoot world wander why scientists dont engage themselves in bigfoot research, read these accusatory, inflammatory and baseless attacks.

I will guarantee with 100% accuracy BLM has never had one negative encounter with NABS, we have never been refused anything from BLM.

I'm not surprised by the attacks, it's normal. There is not one ounce of truth in anything that is posted on this specific blog as people make derogatory statements utilizing an anonymous position.

It's amazing how people claim they are from BFRO yet don't place their name, or, people claim they are from Hoopa yet don't ID themselves. It's easy to hide by "anonymous" or a made up name on a blog.

People, we gain nothing by not assisting one another in this effort, nothing! From the very start, NABS has made public statements that people and groups need to work together to solve this mystery. We don't make public attacks, we don't berate or embarrass witnesses and we hold ourselves to a high standard of research.

I'll remind everyone that Cryptomundo, Loren Coleman stated that the Hoopa Project was the best bigfoot book in 2008, no, it wasn't fiction, and Coast to Coast Radio proclaimed it one of the top 3 books EVER written about bigfoot.

No, we never placed Ray Wallace on a podium, and, yes we made public statements that he did hoax some tracks. You need to read the entire section about Ray to understand why we wrote about him. Again, it's easy to attack someone or something by telling a partial truth about a site or an article....

I usually don't respond to blogs, but I admire Linda and what she is trying to accomplish with this site. I'll leave the people who like to bash each other to themselves and permanently leave you.

I appreciate "Anonymous" attempting to explain the obvious to other readers, it was appreciated. I will gladly speak with any of you at the Oregon conference, and, in fact allow anyone to step onto stage and present your facts, background and theories that challenge our findings, really. You will find we are nice people without big egos or a predisposition for badgering others. I know, you won't be there and you won't appear on stage, but, it's easy to sit back and attack others who are trying to solve a complex equation.But, you will notice something on our site, in our writings and in our beliefs, we are not attacking anyone, there is a place for all beliefs in this world, some may be right, and, some wrong, but, being polite and respectful is something that is grounded in all decent people.

Thanks Linda for the opportunity to explain ourselves, it was appreciated.

David Paulides
NABS

Sierra Tahoe Bigfoot Research said...

I'd like to reiterate what Mr. Paulides wrote in his follow up, "People, we gain nothing by not assisting one another in this effort, nothing!"

So true!

I think you NABS bashers are actually being quite disrespectful to Linda, and Bigfoot Ballyhoo with these negative rants. Linda encourages bigfoot discussion. I don't think this is the path she wants us to take. Enough already! This is a place to share bigfoot information and ideas. Mr. Paulides made it sound as though he was done posting here. Other people will probably be hesitant to share thoughts for fear of being railroaded. All the negative posting is going to kill the good flow that Linda has established here. This is the best site for daily bigfoot news. Don't erode what she has built. RESPECT IT.

(Kudos to you Anonymous for your comments)

Thanks again Linda;))

Chuck

Hoopa Bill Skyles said...

Put a name to these researchers NABS have. Read some of the older comments her then see who lambasted who! Again this is typical NABS work. First he calls himself anonymous then David and now anonymous again.

RETIRED ANG TIRED said...

PEOPLE PLEASE: DON'T START THIS TERRIBLE FIGHTING ON WHAT ONE PERSON BELIEVES ARE AND WHAT OTHERS THINK. EVERYBODY HAS DIFFERENT OPIONS ON HOW TO LOOK FOR BIGFOOT. THIS TYPE OF FIGHTING IS CHILD LIKE AND NEEDS TO STOP. LINDA PERRY THINKS ALL SHOULD HAVE A SAY ON WHAT THEIR THINKING. I TOO BELIEVE WE ALL NEED TO RESPECT OTHERS THINKING AND MOVE ON WITH FINDING THE PROOF REQUIRED TO GET PROTECTION FOR BIGFOOT. IF A PERSON DOES NOT LIKE THE WAY THEY WAS TREATED BY A CERTAIN GROUP OK, BUT DON'T ATTACK THE MESSENGERS.

JF said...

me being a small claims judge I have read every word of past and current post here. Both sides have taken their shots at the other. Some of the guest bloggers have said things they didn't mean. Nobody in my judgement slandered or mistated another. Tempers fly but everybody has their day.

Linda Newton-Perry said...

Judge, are you a bigfoot believer? If so, tell us how you became one. We would love to hear about it.

Judge F said...

I do not believe for a second that anything said here was in anyway disrespectful to Mrs. Perry or David Paulides. People have a right to express their view. Mr. Paulides stated in a earlier post that he thought the group at the lake was going in to kill one. That's fine for someone to express themselves. But then he is confronted with his statements he seems to backup. This to is fine. Nobody knows all there is about this mysterious creature. Taking ones side might be popular but it not always correct. I said earlier both sides see it different but hardly disrespectful. To Mrs. Perry's Question : Yes, I believe something is out there. There are far too many reports of it to be a figment of peoples imagination.

Linda Newton-Perry said...

Thank you for your comment. On the most part those that come to this site are bigfoot believers. I've learned from my newspaper column if I ask for a name, I get very few sighting reports. So we must glean as much truth as we can from what is offered here.