.

Attention European Union Law Users: There are cookies on this blog: Blogger and Goggle maybe more. I hope this meets the need to inform users of this site.


This site is a BIGFOOT ONLINE MAGAZINE, where you can 'Talk Bigfoot.' YOU DO NOT HAVE TO GIVE YOUR NAME.


HOW TO COMMENT
Below post is line that reads:
POSTED BY LINDA NEWTON-PERRY AT OO:OO (TIME) AND THEN WILL READ NO COMMENTS (OR HOW MANY COMMENTS, 1 COMMENT ETC.) CLICK ON THE COMMENTS AND FOLLOW DIRECTIONS.

.

TRY ANOTHER BROWSER IF THE PICTURES AND TEXT ARE JUMBLED UP.


Sunday, July 27, 2014

Photo at Top

Header Photo: Very Top

Christopher and I rented a helicopter a year or so ago to check out a bigfoot sighting area by air. The experience was exhilarating. We didn't observe a bigfoot, but still it was an educational experience. The miles and miles of steep-sided mountains leave no doubt in our minds that a huge animal could live without being seen very often.

In Oregon a problem with the discovery of this animal has presented itself. It is claimed on public lands proof of its existence, photos, and etcetera can not be shared with the public. If one does share the proof, again, it is claimed that one may be sued by some agency of the government.

How does one go about getting around this sticky conundrum? Well, how about not divulging the location of the proof? Do the work, get the proof, but keep the location secret.

To me this makes sense. I do not wish for anyone to be sued or the forest shut down leading to the loss of family wage jobs, and many of them at that!

WHAT DO YOU THINK/BELIEVE?

Best regards, Linda Newton-Perry

No comments: