Thursday, May 3, 2012
Jerry Raafe has left a new comment on your post "Searching for Bigfoot Prints ...":
I was watching YouTube last night and found the video of Phil Morris that claims he sold the suit to Patterson for $435.00 in 1967.
I have to say, the man is pretty compelling, because he knows all the little details about the costume and Patterson, along with a receipt from the money order in Sept 67.
If this is true, then why are some people still protecting Bob Gimlin as some kind of super Bigfoot king?
People have claimed Bill Emery has done great damage to the Bigfoot community by not releasing the photos he holds.
Talk about double standards! If the film is fake then the damage from the two Yakima men will forever shadow any thing to date regarding Bigfoot.
Why doesn't someone look into what Morris says and find out if Patterson did have a suit in 67? If he did then it's a no-brainer: the film is a hoax. (I guess you meant is.)
Yes, I wish these claims could be cleared up as well. All I know about the Emery Team's photos is that Emery has bigfoot's interest first in importance. It will soon be 21 months since they got the photos. If anyone knows anything, please comment. Thank you for the comment. ... LNP
P.S. Could you explain the point about double standards. I don't understand. Thanks