Sunday, February 27, 2011
Andra Ellis has left a new comment on your post "Bigfoot Sighting!":
My dad is a retired wildlife biologist and now thinks that the proof needed to move Sasquatch from legend to fact has been met. You see for many years science has quietly been studying the available physical evidence on the Sasquatch. Thou it is not unanimous, the vast number of wildlife bios think it better than 70% for the existence of such a creature. What nobody can agree on is the number of them alive and where.
Most believe only the most remote regions of the USA and Canada may harbor the remaining numbers. While others think the Sasquatch is very few in numbers and likely a sub-human leftover from the extreme past of human evolution.
For the most part these bios do not like to talk in theory. As you are aware many thought only bones would give science a heads up on what the Sasquatch might or might not be. Recent advances in science make it possible to catalog the Sasquatch without teeth or bones.
So maybe very soon the controversy will be over.
Thank you for this comment. We can hardly wait until that day. ... LNP