It is the opinion of Bigfoot Ballyhoo, its editors, that the Patterson-Gimlin film of 1967 is of a real bigfoot. But because of all the doubting, it seems, we are left with the feeling that we really haven't seen the animal at all. Perhaps this is the platypus syndrome kicking in. You know the story of where one platypus on the scientist's examining table was not good enough. So, another "body" had to be captured.
Maybe we just require a second great photo of bigfoot. What do you readers think?
We here at Ballyhoo do believe that on the Internet there is right now several "real" films/videos of bigfoot. But, of course, they are all not clear enough to prove a thing. But that doesn't mean the film is not of a "real" bigfoot. Voice an opinion and comment.
Posts
