Sam Daniels has left a new comment:
"An Opinion on Columbus Day Victim: The photos":
I have wanted for a long time to find out the truth on the pictures from 1962. Someone on this blog advised that one might contact a civil rights lawyer to release the photo. Her name is Dawn Salines and I will quote her response. "Under the patriot act of 2001, the government may seize and classify any material they believe to be harmful or not in the best interest of society." I asked her if Bigfoot could or would fall under that category and she smiled and said: "Yes they may deem Bigfoot to be dangerous to people in general like UFO sightings."
I told her of the Chicago attorney and other comments posted here and her response was: "They clearly don't have the knowledge of how the government works these days."
Then I asked the hundred pound question: If a person has or obtains a picture of a Bigfoot that was taken away by the government in 1962 would such a picture be legal to post?
Her answer: "Your getting into unknown territory here. If the government hid the remains and took the pictures from people then I would say it would be illegal to post such a photo without consent from the feds."
She said many people like to quarterback these laws and some live to regret it. Now before somebody says I talked to the wrong attorney let me say this lady is known to be sharp with UFO and other government cases.
Monday, September 20, 2010
Footprints: Bigfoot?
Hank Parchell
Today I went to a location between Sixes River and Elk River to investigate a trail of footprints found this morning at 6:30 by a logging crew on their job site. We have had heavy rain over the last weekend and things are once again on the muddy side. The footprints were 17 inches in length and 7 inches at the ball. The crew told me they haven't had any problems on this job with damage or any sightings of unusual animals.
The line of tracks came from a small stream up to the landing where the prints went around the yarder and then walked down a dirt road for approx 300 feet into the woods. The prints were not made by a flat surface like wood (meaning Hoax). They show definite signs of muscle action in the tarsal and ball area. I would guess the maker of these tracks weight to be 5 to 6 hundred lbs.
The logger and land owner has asked to be left out of the report and for us not to reveal the exact location for fear of onlookers coming in there. I took lots of pictures of the prints and and trail of prints and will give them to Bill when he returns home. The prints are five toed with a unusual hump on the right toe area. The crew reported that no visible prints were present at 3pm on Friday Sept 18th.
For Fun: One Dog's Opinion
Photo: Photoxpress
"Phew, you think I stink after I get caught in the rain! Bigfoot's got it all over me in that category!... TALK STINK! ... WOW! Mind you, I've never smelled one; just saying ... "
A Video of Bigfoot?
Linda and Christopher Perry at a bookstore event
At http://www.northamericanbigfoot.blogspot.com/ a video is running that you may enjoy. The figure on the video looks a lot like our ESP figure first sent to this blog. Enjoy and let us know what you think. ... Linda Newton-Perry
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



