Announcement: Bigfoot Ballyhoo has been under attack, in the past, by a couple of people who wished Ballyhoo and its editors to look as if they were hoaxing information.

One of the biggest examples would be the claim that we made up the ESP Team, Bill Emery, Cole Saxton and the late Hank Parchell. A well-known bigfoot researcher found photos that looked like Emery, Saxton and Parchell. He claimed the three to be the real men and not any part of the ESP Team. (In fact, he claimed there was no ESP Team).

And then while the Emery Team was processing trail cam photos a couple were sent to Ballyhoo. These photos turned out to be well-known bigfoot photos, one from a movie and one of Patty. The technician’s son that was processing the trail cam photos replaced the real photos with fakes. In good faith Emery sent the dallied-with photos to Ballyhoo. When it was found out what happened it was explained.

Another photo of a footprint with a believable history was given Ballyhoo to post. Turned out to be Tim Fasano’s photo from Florida. Again, we’ve given explanations for each occurrence. We were hoaxed.

We in time recognized each hoax and explained what happened



Saturday, July 31, 2010

Where is Sru Lake?

Sru Lake is near the white dot and just below Powers, Oregon.

Cole Saxton Comments on Bill Emery


Cole has left a new comment on your post "Bill Emery Comments":


Bill has always believed this bigfoot is a danger to people. He is simply trying to get info on the creature for the people of this world. He wants to get a clear photo of the bigfoot so he can go to USFS and show them the people are actually seeing this bigfoot up there. He also wants badly to prevent the destruction of this bigfoot because of an attack by it on people. He feels it's going to happen if the people and bigfoot mix.

 A very unpopular view by Bill to some people is that these creatures need to be protected not shot. He is and always has been very cautious about this bigfoot. It is our belief that nothing short of a good photo will bring a reasonable response from USFS in Powers. Bill has come across people with guns looking for fame up there and told them the chance of a terrible outcome for them is very good if they try to shoot it.

Bill and I believe it would be next to impossible to kill the bigfoot with just one shot. A person may never get a chance at a second one.

Comments on Emery's Posts

#1
 by Anonymous
October 20 2007. A hunter reported that he had shot a bear near Squaw Lake in the illahee quad of the Siskiyous. The man who was hunting said he thought the animal was a big bear and shot it twice after it followed him for 2 miles making terrible sounds .the USFS took the report. They filed it under bear shot near 3300#3348.What was strange about the report is the hunter insisted the bear stood up on two feet and walked into the heavy brush. The hunter fled the area thinking he had shot something other than a bear. I believe as Emery does this was not a bear but the bigfoot. It is believed the bigfoot lost his eye in the accident.


#2
by Amber Caughell has left a new comment on your post "Bill Emery Comments":

Squaw Lake was the name for Sru in 2007. It was renamed Sru in 2009. Over the past 20 years many have talked about the strange being on the mountain there. My dad told me of it in 93 or 94. Many of the local loggers have seen it claiming it is over 9 ft tall and very large. Many 20 inch tracks over the last 15 years have come from that area. This would make it larger than most of the ones sighted. The Thompson family had a bad scare up there in 2008? I think.USF has always blamed it on misidentification of a known forest animal. They have never taken any report from the area serious in my book. Some say the FS is covering up the reports. It is my belief thay just don't believe them.

#3
by Anonymous
I tend to agree with you Amber. I don't think there is a major cover up . I think it is a case of "experts" who think they know more then they do .




Taken from the book, I KNOW WHAT I SAW END OF STORY


In my soul I know it’s true, bigfoot lives on mountains world ‘round.
He keeps to place like all we do, though following instinct he’s bound.
Will we ever know “his” truth? Will he ever be “found”?

Linda Newton-Perry

Bill Emery answers question about the bed.

Bill Emery has left a new comment on your post "Bill Emery Comments":


The bed was a very crude layout of ferns and grass. It was about 10ft by 8ft and looked as if something had laid there over a weeks time. This is where I found the blood I mistook for menstrual blood. Also the area around the bed was covered with bark from trees as a presumed cover for it. Yes I am armed. I don't want to have to use it but would if the creature was to actually attack me. The aggressive demeanor of the bigfoot is because and in my belief that it was shot twice some 3 years ago by a scared hunter. All indications are this bigfoot seems to be rogue male with no fear of man.

In actuality, I believe this bigfoot is going to get hold of a person. Yet I don't want to see it killed if at all preventable.

"A Matter of Time" Perry's Newspaper Column


Bill Emery Searches for Bigfoot


It just occurred to me as I typed the word bigfoot, above, that when the being is given its scientific name perhaps the public will treat the whole subject with more respect. Maybe the moniker, bigfoot, will be dropped and the new exotic name will be in common use. Is this what it’s going to take to change the habit people have of grinning or outright laughing at the mere mention of it? What’s laughable about a monster-size furry being traipsing about the forests, sometimes in an angry mood? Oh, I know several of the reasons for taking the animal lightly, all explained in the words: many hoaxes and publicity seekers out to sell books and demand substantial speaking fees. I mention these so you will not think me naive. Of course, once the being is “discovered,” this should change most, if not all of the laughing tendency.

Again, Bill Emery is in the woods near Sru Lake seeking to discover what is doing the nighttime damage in the area. It’s been reported that picnic tables have been turned over, a weighty fire ring found well away from the campsite and big rocks blocking the road. Also, no lights have been seen at night in the area, which would be needed if the damage had been done by human pranksters (which can not be ruled out at this time). Just one main road leads to Sru Lake. Again there is talk of closing the small lake.

In early July, Bill Emery collected blood samples he found in a bed while hiking the Sru Lake area. We all waited patiently for him to tell us the results and here they are in his words: “After weeks of analysis the blood and hair samples collected by me have came back. They are baffling to me and unexpected. Conclusion: The hair follicles are similar to human structure but with 14 unfamiliar markers clearly not human related. The blood samples collected show 2 known strands to human but have major difference in shaft size and DNA makeup. Conclusion: Human: No positive match; Primate: No positive match; Animal: No positive match. Final conclusion: Unable to identify as any known species. Reasons may be possible contamination in samples, and possible degradation of samples.”

Go to the blog, www.bigfootballyhoo.blogspot.com to follow along with Bill Emery’s adventure in “discovering” bigfoot. Until next week, Linda Newton-Perry