Linda Newton-Perry Comments

I took a call today from a Tim Boone. I assume he doesn't mind me telling his name as he didn't say not to. We spoke for a long time. He wanted to know about the Vanfossen Photo. And then he went on to tell me about his own sighting, and about a sighting someone else had. The other sighting had a very interesting twist to it.  He said this person observed two bigfoots walking and holding hands!

I'm looking forward to Tim emailing me a drawing of the bigfoot he saw. Please share your sighting or if you know of one, tell us about it.

It's been a sad day. I do feel awful about not getting to see the Vanfossen Photo. But perhaps we will get to see photos from the closed file soon. Comment, we are waiting to hear from you.

A Moment of Silence!

Photo: Photoxpress

Now! Let's Get on With Bigfoot Talk!

Has anyone thought of placing a trail cam at the intersection of hwy 38 and Loon Lake turnoff? This is the road to Reedsport from Sutherlin, Oregon. The way things are going it's probably against some law. But I thought I would ask. LP

Melvin xxxxxx on '62 Animal Photo

Melvin xxxxxx has left a new comment on your post "Ms xxxxxx, Please Do Not Send the Photo":


Some of the sarcasm here is overwhelming . As your request we will not send the photo to this blog. My mother and I do not wish to be caught up in such vicious attacks on one's character. I did think maybe for once this creature could be shown to the public without judgement on people.

 Linda we do not blame you for the snide remarks of some. Thanks for the interest. I do feel the lady from the law group is correct on the file and photos. And yes, I do know my father was asked in 1963 to turn over to USFS all photos he took but didnt't with just this one.

____________

Thank you for replying to this latest situation. I guess bigfoot believers can be a little testy! I find the whole situation a little unbelievable. But, I don't wish for neither of us to get into "trouble" with the law. It was exciting to think, we almost got to see a photo of this animal. Again thanks and keep enjoying this site.
...Linda Newton-Perry

A Note from Linda Newton-Perry

Dear Readers,
     Not one person could possibly be more upset about this situation than I am. I was so looking forward to seeing the '62 bigfoot. But if all goes well, we will see one of these photos soon. Each one of you will be able to go to the government site and pull the file up.
     I am just not willing to risk so much for this animal. Debbie from Rand Corp Group has given me advice and I'm taking it.
     You may vent, I understand.
Linda Newton-Perry

Ms xxxxxx , Please Do Not Send the Photo

Please do not send the photo. We can not even view it. We are crestfallen....Linda Newton-Perry

Is this true? Debbie's Reply

Is this true Debbie? See below

Showing a photo of federal classified material is a federal felony offense folks! If the animal in question is still classified all that possess it are guilty of holding classified material.

Debbie's Reply:
12:05 EST: After looking it up in the federal law statutes, it is very much illegal to hold or view classified material without authorization from the government. The penalty is very harsh to say the least. If this photo is of the creature of 1962 then it's classified. I would strongly advise you to try to wait for the file to become open and public before you put yourselves in this kind of quandary.

____________
We will not show, view or accept this photo. Thank you Debbie for keeping us out of trouble....Linda Newton-Perry