Who to Lead the Charge?

Guest Editor-Blogger: Marvin

 Regarding: "...present the case for BF on a public forum.""

I would gladly donate. But who do we get to lead the charge? Also the state would certainly point out many other sates do it too. Also bigfoot has never been caught so what do you use for evidence? All they would do is say the people that see bigfoot are a danger to the roads.

Only one man seemed to want to change this and he's dead. The rest of them have been totally silent on this issue.The states pull many stunts that are not necessarily legal.

Sharing Beauty

Photo: Photoxpress

Enjoy for I am simply sharing beauty.  I don't know where this photo was taken but it could be several of our Oregon rivers.

"...a stiff penalty to keep more people from reporting bigfoot."

Guest Editor-Blogger:Mary Rondeu
 Regarding: "...present the case for BF on a public forum."":

It was my fathers intent to bring this out to the nation on CNN. Hopefully Bill Emery will do the show with the help of law enforcement officers that have had the rug pulled out from under them too. A person needs the help of the networks to get this practice stopped for good.

 My dad realized this after finding out on this very blog that people were getting suspensions from the state. We know several police officers that have told dad they would appear with him on the show.

CNN says the filming is still on but has been temporary shoved back because of Haiti and other things. If people didn't have to worry about retribution from the state we believe many more reports would surface. Dad was convinced this practice was and is nothing more than a stiff penalty to keep more people from reporting bigfoot.

"...present the case for BF on a public forum."

Guest Editor-Blogger: Anonymous

Regarding: "Linn County Cop Explains License Suspension Practi...":


This could provide an opportunity for the BF research community to present the case for BF on a public forum...A class action suit by several drivers challenging the rational for the OR DMV 's suspension practice, ie; A driver who sees a creature which doesn't exist must be suffering some mental problems & is therefore unfit to drive..

Turn the trial into a trial on BF's existence...Get Dr's Jane Goodall, Meldrum, Bindernagel, Farenbach, Swindler & other PHDs to testify along with print expert Jim Chilcut. Ex-LEO, BLM & fish & game folks might well come out of the woodwork to offer testimony...Ask for small donations from BF believers to cover legal fees, ( until the state of Oregon is forced, as part of the settlement, to cover plantiff's legal fees)...BFRO's Moneymaker is a lawyer..Let's see what he can put together?

Please Comment!

An "Expensive" Bigfoot Sighting

Guest Editor-Blogger: Frank Berns

I've been asked by a good friend and Bigfoot investigator to tell my hell story to you. Back in 1993 I was driving a log truck when I was unfortunate to run across one of these Bigfoot while going to a job one early morning.

I reported this thing to a police officer. Several weeks later I received a suspension of my CDL in the mail. I was in disbelieve as I had been driving truck for thirty years with no tickets or accidents. Over the next few weeks the state put me through the ringer. In order to reinstate my CDL I had to pay a $1,200 reinstatement fee and go to a doctor in Portland.

He told me Bigfoot does not exist and I need to keep telling myself and others I had seen a bear not Bigfoot. It made me furious that he was ordering me to lie. I owned my own truck and the insurance went through the roof because of the suspension. After all was said and done it cost me over $10,000 dollars because I reported seeing a Bigfoot. I'm not saying people shouldn't report just telling my experience with the state.

____________

Thank you so much for telling us about your "expensive sighting."...Linda Newton-Perry

Click Older Posts