Announcement: Bigfoot Ballyhoo has been under attack, in the past, by a couple of people who wished Ballyhoo and its editors to look as if they were hoaxing information.

One of the biggest examples would be the claim that we made up the ESP Team, Bill Emery, Cole Saxton and the late Hank Parchell. A well-known bigfoot researcher found photos that looked like Emery, Saxton and Parchell. He claimed the three to be the real men and not any part of the ESP Team. (In fact, he claimed there was no ESP Team).

And then while the Emery Team was processing trail cam photos a couple were sent to Ballyhoo. These photos turned out to be well-known bigfoot photos, one from a movie and one of Patty. The technician’s son that was processing the trail cam photos replaced the real photos with fakes. In good faith Emery sent the dallied-with photos to Ballyhoo. When it was found out what happened it was explained.

Another photo of a footprint with a believable history was given Ballyhoo to post. Turned out to be Tim Fasano’s photo from Florida. Again, we’ve given explanations for each occurrence. We were hoaxed.

We in time recognized each hoax and explained what happened



Tuesday, July 27, 2010

"... someone injured at Sru ..."

Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Sru Lake":


If you have followed this blog there was someone injured at Sru a couple months back by this creature. He did comment here about it so stop commenting when you don't know. Read the old blogs about Sru lake. Shame on the forest service for not warning these people. They should have their kids left there overnight. More deny and ridicule

It would not surprise me if they were spreading these lies TO COVER THEIR %#!*S

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

Someone was REPORTEDLY injured.

It amazes me how rumor and innuendo so quickly turn to FACT on this blog. It's the online equivalent of a witch hunt.

If the government is covering anything up, it's probably to protect the bigfoot from the rabidly curious.

If you approach a bear's den, you might be dinner. If you step too close to a buck during rut, you might get your head caved in by a couple of well-placed hooves. Filing a "complaint" with the forest service because a forest creature ACTS LIKE A FOREST CREATURE is ridiculous.

What's next? Torches and pitchforks?

Funny how the comments suggesting rational reaction, rather than emotional sensationalism, never make it to "guest blog" status.

Anonymous said...

Maybe if the USFS would admit that this creature exists. Use a proper warning system like they do for bears, cougars, and rattle snakes we would get off their case. People can't make a responsible decision if they don't have all the info. So keep ridiculing them for what they see and hear thats the answer??

Diann E said...

The USFS, BLM, enviromentalist, etc. surely play a large part in why this creature's exsistence is guarded so closely. Imagine they confirm the exsistence of Bigfoot, large imagination needed. The logging industry, the mills, would all be heavily influenced by the confirmation. How do we protect this creature, do we limit logging, limit access to all wilderness forest, protect it's enviroment and that's just the tip of this iceberg. Enviromentalist would go wild with restrictions on logging, land use, access etc. It would be a logistical nightmare. But in denying the exsistence they have tied their own hands and the public's distrust of them because of Bigfoot must be a hard pill to swallow. Needless to say a portion of the Bigfoot community would unfortunately be in total uproar. We don't need a pack of Biscardi's screaming for evidence. It really is not an easy situation.